Independent reference. We are independent of every vendor listed. No affiliate links. No sponsored placements.
General-purpose vs coding

Manus vs Devin Cost Comparison 2026

Which costs less for general-purpose agentic work at small, mid and heavy volumes?

Headline answer

Same $20 entry price, different jobs. Manus wins on general research / ops / data workflows metered in credits. Devin wins on coding-specific tasks that benefit from work-tracker integration. Pick by the workload, not the price.

Side by side

Vendor page

Manus

Manus is a credit-metered general-purpose agent: Starter $20 buys 4,000 credits. Heavy tasks (deep research, long browsing sessions) routinely consume 100+ credits each.

Where Manus wins

  • General-purpose: research, data, ops, browsing, document workflows
  • Free tier with 300 daily refresh credits
  • Single credit unit across task types
Manus pricing →
Vendor page

Devin

Devin is a coding-specific managed agent: Pro $20 with quota, Max $200 with significantly higher quota, plus overage at underlying frontier-model API rates.

Where Devin wins

  • Coding-specific: ticket-to-PR pipeline
  • Tight work-tracker integration
  • Frontier-model agnostic (OpenAI / Claude / Gemini)
Devin pricing →

Feature heatmap

Green = included on the cheapest published plan. Amber = partial or add-on. Red = not included. Grey = quote only, cannot confirm.

FeatureManusDevin
Coding-agent specialisation
General-purpose task variety
Free tier
Credit-based metering
Work-tracker integration
Concurrent tasks at Starter

Per-task cost ledgers (illustrative example, not a real company)

50 deep-research tasks / month on Manus
01Starter plan included credits
4,000
02Avg 80 credits per task x 50
4,000 used
03Starter plan monthly
$20
Cost per task~$0.40
50 coding tasks / month on Devin Pro
01Pro plan monthly
$20
02Within Pro quota at light volume
Included
Cost per task~$0.40

Switching cost

Direct answer

If you are on the wrong one

These are different products with overlapping price points. Switching is a workload decision, not a cost decision. A team using Manus for coding work usually finds Devin cheaper per merged PR; a team using Devin for non-coding research finds Manus cheaper per finished research deliverable.

Direct answer

How to validate before signing

Run a fixed test corpus across both vendors for at least 30 days, log per-interaction cost in both systems, and confirm the unit of billing (conversation, resolution, message, task) matches your accounting model before committing to an annual deal.

Last verified June 2026